Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a bit better than the Galaxy S8, with a overall score of 82.2 against 81.7. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 body is thicker and way heavier than the Galaxy S8. The Galaxy S8 has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2960 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount in each screen inch.
The Galaxy S8 has slightly more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a bit better processor than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy S8 counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.