Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 481 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a global score of 82.2, which is a bit better than Xperia XZ Premium's 79.8 global score. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 design is just a bit heavier and thicker than Xperia XZ Premium. Xperia XZ Premium counts with a much sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher number of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 2160 x 3840 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 and Sony Xperia XZ Premium count with very similar processors, and although the Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xperia XZ Premium takes better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a back camera with much less MP and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality.
The Xperia XZ Premium counts with slightly more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3230mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.