Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's 73.9 global score. The Apple iPhone X is a a bit lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The iPhone X counts with an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a bit sharper display than iPhone X, because it has a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px, way more brightness, a quite larger screen and a just a little greater pixels density. The Apple iPhone X counts with slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84% larger battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S captures a little bit better photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor shooting way worse quality videos and photographs and a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.