Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 496 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, getting a general score of 82 against 73.9. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Apple iPhone XR construction is just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a better display than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a lot higher pixel count per inch of display, a way brighter display, a bit bigger display and a way higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The iPhone XR features a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has 2 less CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S captures a bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor shooting lot worse quality videos and pictures and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, it also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a superior battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.