Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's score of 73.9. IPhone XS's body is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Apple iPhone XS features an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has lesser processing cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a little bit better screen than iPhone XS, because it has a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px, way more brightness, a little bit higher display pixel density and a little bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a superior battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a slightly better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has a lot smaller camera sensor taking lot lower quality images and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a way more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.