Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's 73.9 score. The Google Pixel construction is a little thicker but way lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Google Pixel has a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because it has a larger screen, a just a little greater pixels amount per screen inch and a way higher 2080 x 2400 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor which offers a lot worse image and video quality, it also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a bigger aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has an 81% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.