Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, having an 80 score against 73.9. Google Pixel 3's construction is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Google Pixel 3 has a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a little higher display pixel density, a lot higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and/or video in low light environments and a lot tinier sensor offering a much lower image quality, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.