Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, with an 80.7 score against 73.9. The Google Pixel 3 XL is a a little thinner but just a bit heavier phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little larger screen and a bit higher 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments and a much smaller sensor taking less light and duller colors, it also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.