Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, with a 78.8 score against 73.9. The Google Pixel 3a body has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, but it's lighter. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a much better display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a way better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a quite greater pixel density and a little larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a way smaller sensor which gives a much lower photo and video quality and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot better 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.