Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, getting a global score of 81.9 against 73.9. Google Pixel 4's design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, but it is a little bit lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a much better resolution of 2080 x 2400px and a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Google Pixel 4 features a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S shoots clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a way smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.