Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's 73.9 global score. Google Pixel 4 XL is a a bit heavier device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, but they are equally thin. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a quite worse pixel number per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger display and a bit higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a much more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.