Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, getting a general score of 82.9 against 73.9. The Google Pixel 4a is a notably lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, but both of them have the same thickness. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 11 operating system, so both should give you very similar OS features.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a much better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a better 2080 x 2400 resolution, a little bigger screen and a just a little higher screen density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and a much tinier sensor taking way worse quality images, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.