Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| -- | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's 73.9 global score. Google Pixel 5 is a just a bit thinner and lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because it has a better resolution of 2080 x 2400px, a bit larger display and a just a little higher pixel count in each inch of screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 5 features a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor shooting way worse quality pictures and videos and a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better 108 megapixels resolution back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has longer battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.