Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 496 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, with a score of 77.7 against 73.9. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has 5.0 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has Android 11 version. The HTC One M9 design is lighter but somewhat thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S.
HTC One M9 has a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a GPU. HTC One M9 features a display that's very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's display, although the HTC One M9 has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a just a little inferior pixel number in each inch of display and a really smaller screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S shoots clearer pictures and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has a lot tinier sensor, it also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and video. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.