Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, having a overall score of 81.3 against 73.9. The LG V35 ThinQ design is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. LG V35 ThinQ features a lot better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a bit more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2080 x 2400 and a bit larger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S shoots slightly better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, it also counts with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ features a better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.