Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| -- | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 496 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, getting a 79.8 score against 73.9. Despite being the best in this review, the Motorola One Hyper design is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2080 x 2400px and a higher pixel density.
The Motorola One Hyper has a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features improved battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Motorola One Hyper shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, although it has a way worse 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.