Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 496 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's 73.9 global score. Motorola One Vision's body is just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a much better display than Motorola One Vision, because it has a little bigger display, a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 and a little greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Motorola One Vision takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a back facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and videos and a bigger aperture.
Motorola One Vision counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a superior battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.