Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's overall score of 73.9. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy A31's construction is just a little heavier and just a little thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has a better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit greater pixels density. Galaxy A31 has a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A31, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A31 features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations and a much lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A31 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S count with incredibly similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.