Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's overall score of 73.9. The Galaxy A50 body is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has a just a bit better display pixels density and a better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy A50 has just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has improved battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a lot smaller sensor and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.