Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, having an 86.6 score against 73.9. The Galaxy A50s is a just a bit lighter and a little thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a really superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A50s also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a more vivid display than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has a just a bit better display density and a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px.
Samsung Galaxy A50s captures better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a lot lower 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy A50s counts with slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.