Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, getting a general score of 85.5 against 73.9. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Samsung Galaxy A51's construction is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a little greater count of pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy A51 features a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A51 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures in poorly lited situations and a much less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features improved battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.