Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, having a 90.8 score against 73.9. Even being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body is just a bit thicker and just a little heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both devices we compare here include the same Android 11 operating system.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a back camera with way less mega-pixels and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.