Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, with a general score of 91.3 against 73.9. Despite being the best phone we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has Android 11, providing the user some additional features and some performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an extremely better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a better 2080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a lot lower 64 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.