Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, getting a 76.9 score against 73.9. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has Android 11. The Galaxy A70 is a a bit heavier but a little bit thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A70 counts with a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photos in poorly lited situations and a much smaller back camera sensor taking much worse quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.