Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 496 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's 73.9 overall score. Despite being the best we compare here, Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per display inch and a better 2080 x 2400px resolution. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G UW captures much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a much bigger sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.