Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's score of 73.9. The Galaxy A9 (2018) body is a bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a greater pixel density, a lot higher 2080 x 2400px resolution and a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32 percent bigger battery capacity. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures in low-light situations and a way larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.