Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's score of 73.9. The Galaxy Fold construction is somewhat thinner but incredibly heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has Android 11.
Galaxy Fold counts with a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a much better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or video in low light environments and a much smaller camera sensor, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.