Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, getting a 79.3 score against 73.9. Galaxy Note 5 is a a bit lighter and just a bit thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Note 5 has a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor capturing way lower quality photos and videos, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 108 megapixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.