Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, with a global score of 89 against 73.9. Galaxy Note10's construction is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a way better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a quite larger screen, a much higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a quite higher pixels count per display inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a way smaller back camera sensor offering a way lower image quality and a way smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution camera.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit more storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.