Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's overall score of 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Galaxy S7 has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, a lot smaller display and less brightness, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture and a way tinier sensor shooting lot worse quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a way higher 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.