Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's 73.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is thinner but a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has Android 11 version, so it provides you some extra features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite higher amount of pixels per display inch. Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a way smaller sensor shooting lot worse quality photos and videos and a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.