Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's 73.9 overall score. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a notably heavier but thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 2080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor capturing much better quality pictures and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.