Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, having a score of 87.9 against 73.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has Android 11 version. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's construction is just a bit thicker and heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400, a higher pixel number in each inch in the display and a bit more display brightness. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with an extremely better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.