Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-11-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is much better than Google Pixel 4, having a 91.5 score against 81.9. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is notably newer than the Google Pixel 4, it is just a little bit thicker and notably heavier. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little inferior pixels quantity per inch of display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer captures a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a lot bigger sensor and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 54% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.