Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-11-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a score of 91.5, which is much better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 global score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's construction is newer than Google Pixel 4 XL's, but it's just a little heavier and a little thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL has a display that's very similar to the screen in Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos and a way better 200 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.