Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-11-01 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a score of 91.5, which is better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer design is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than HTC U Ultra. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with just a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and 4 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a slightly better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per screen inch and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. HTC U Ultra features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a much better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in low light situations, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.