Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-11-01 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a score of 91.5, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has 12 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is a extremely newer device, and it is also just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer and nubia Red Magic 3S have extremely similar storage to store more apps and games, both have the same 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a superior camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has faster 30 frames per second video frame rates, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a way more megapixels back camera.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features superior battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.