Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-11-01 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a global score of 91.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52's 90.7 global score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's body is newer than Samsung Galaxy A52's, but it is just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a bigger aperture, a much better 200 megapixels resolution back camera and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.