Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's score of 91.5. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has Android 12. The Galaxy A71 5G UW body is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G UW. They have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the same quantity of pixels per inch of display and a same size screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a larger diafragm aperture, a camera with much more MP and a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a 5% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.