Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-11-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, getting a score of 97.6 against 91.5. The Galaxy Fold is a notably older and way heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, but Samsung could make it much thinner anyway. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has Android 12, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Galaxy Fold features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a greater camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor and a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has 256 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.