Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's score of 91.5. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, but it is just a little heavier. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has Android 12.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger display, more pixels per screen inch and way more brightness. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with faster 30 fps video frame rate, a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and video and a lot more MP camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.