Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.97 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has an overall score of 91.5, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer design is a lot newer, way thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both devices in this review come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs in low light environments, it also counts with a camera with a way better 200 mega-pixels resolution, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.