Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is much better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, having a 91.5 score against 81. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is a noticeably newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a more recent 12 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 6% bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a camera in the back with a much higher 200 megapixels resolution and a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.