Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, with a global score of 91.5 against 88.5. Both of these phones work with the same Android 12 OS (Operating System), so they should provide very similar OS features. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer design is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little worse pixels number in each inch in the display, they both have a display of the same size. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with a lot better 200 megapixels resolution camera, a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light situations and a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer and Galaxy Z Flip have extremely similar memory capacity to install games and applications, they have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 30 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.