Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, getting a 92.3 score against 91.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an way older cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, but Samsung could make it lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has Android 12.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of display, they both have a screen with the same size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's storage capacity to install applications and games is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back, a way bigger sensor and a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low light situations.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 30 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.