Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a 91.5 score against 81.6. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features and increased performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer body is extremely newer, a little lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 and the same pixels density, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has much more brightness. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a superior camera than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a back camera with a much better resolution, a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photos and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with superior battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.