Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-11-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, with a general score of 80 against 75.7. The Google Pixel 3 design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, but it's noticeably lighter. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen.
Google Pixel 3 has a much more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP and a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.