Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-11-01 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's 75.7 overall score. Although Google Pixel 3a is incredibly older and just a little bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12 version.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution and a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.