Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, getting a global score of 82.9 against 75.7. These phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12. Even though the Google Pixel 4a is much older and a bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, it's body is still lighter.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger screen. Google Pixel 4a counts with a much greater performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro and the Google Pixel 4a count with really similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro captures a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a much bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera with a way higher resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.