Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, with an 85.5 score against 75.7. Galaxy A51 is a just a little lighter device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, but they have the same thickness. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a little worse pixel count in each display inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also has a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures, a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.